Crypto Industry Progress Must Accelerate Before Trump Leaves Office
Crypto Industry Progress Must Accelerate Before Trump Leaves Office, Warns Etherealize Co-Founder.
Crypto industry progress is facing a narrow political window, and the clock is already ticking. While the current US administration is widely viewed as supportive of digital assets, some voices inside the industry believe that momentum could quickly reverse once political leadership changes.
That urgency was clearly outlined by Danny Ryan, co-founder of Etherealize, who argues that crypto must embed itself deeply into the financial system before the current political cycle ends.
The reason is not just regulation. It is politics.
Why Crypto Industry Progress Depends on Timing
The administration of Donald Trump has delivered some of the most meaningful legislative wins crypto has seen in the US. Stablecoin frameworks and clearer regulatory language have helped legitimize parts of the market that once operated in legal grey zones.
At the same time, Trump’s personal and family involvement in crypto ventures has complicated the political landscape. For critics, those ties blur the line between policy and profit. For the industry, they risk turning crypto into a partisan issue rather than a neutral technology.
Ryan believes that this is precisely why crypto industry progress must happen now. If large financial institutions, global capital, and core market infrastructure adopt crypto during this period, the debate changes permanently.
Instead of arguing whether crypto should exist, the conversation shifts to how it should be used responsibly.
From Political Target to Critical Infrastructure
Ryan’s vision is straightforward. If crypto becomes essential to capital markets, payments, and institutional finance, future administrations will find it harder to attack the industry outright.
In that scenario, regulation becomes about refinement, not rejection. Crypto would be treated less like a speculative experiment and more like foundational technology, similar to how the internet evolved from controversy to necessity.
This is why Ryan sees the current phase as a rare opportunity. Not because politics favors crypto forever, but because adoption today creates resilience tomorrow.
Political Backlash Is Already Visible
Despite legislative wins, political tension is growing. Opposition lawmakers have repeatedly raised concerns about conflicts of interest tied to Trump-linked crypto ventures. Those concerns have already disrupted regulatory discussions, with hearings veering away from policy details and into ethics debates.
Ryan has seen this firsthand. During congressional testimony related to crypto market structure, political sensitivity around Trump’s involvement often overshadowed technical discussion. Lawmakers who might otherwise engage deeply appeared cautious, aware that crypto regulation had become politically charged.
That environment, Ryan argues, slows real progress.
Why the Next Administration Matters
Ryan is realistic about what comes next. A future administration may try to unwind Trump-era policies or aggressively revisit anything associated with his presidency. Crypto could become collateral damage in that process.
But if the industry proves its value now, any future response is more likely to reshape the edges rather than dismantle the system entirely. Regulation may tighten, but outright reversal becomes impractical once crypto is embedded into institutional workflows.
That is the bet many industry builders are making.
Conclusion
Crypto industry progress is no longer just about technology or innovation. It is about timing, adoption, and political insulation. Danny Ryan’s warning is not ideological. It is strategic.
If crypto can establish itself as essential infrastructure before political winds shift, its future becomes far more stable. If not, the industry risks being pulled back into partisan conflict just as it begins to mature.
About the Author
